2/18/2024 0 Comments Online image duplicate checkerMost papers took only 1 min to scan, but papers from with a lot of different figures and panels might take up to 15 min. I would only count these duplications “inappropriate” if the photos were used to represent different experiments. lanes 1 and 5 in a Western blot strip that look identical). two microscopy photos representing different experiments, but with a clear overlap), or duplications within the same photo (e.g. a Western blot from Figure 1B reused in Figure 5C), within the same figure (e.g. I would look for duplicated panels within the same paper (e.g. The other half of the 20,000 papers used for this screen had been published in 39 other journals with a range of impact factors.ĭuring my scan of a paper, I would not read the text, but just focus on the photos. About half of the papers that I scanned came from PLOS ONE, an Open Access journal that has an easy website to search and flip through figures. I also scanned flow cytometry plots, since they contain unique constellations of datapoints. In 2014-2015 I checked a set of 20,621 biomedical papers that contained photos, such as Western Blots, gels, or microscopy images. How does one scan for duplicated images in scientific paper, and how can one determine if those are a sign of misconduct? This post will give some background about my past and current work on this topic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |